A scholar who had spent many years learning how little can be known climbed to a mountain temple to set his understanding before an old Zen master.
He placed a book on the table between them.
“I have come to a hard truth,” he said. “Nothing can be known for certain. Even this I hold only as very probable, never as sure.”
The master said nothing, but let the book sit where he had put it.
It did not fall.
“The table holds it,” she said. “Neither you nor I can prove why. Yet you set it down without hesitation. Tell me—when you let go of it, were you uncertain?”
“No,” the scholar admitted. “I simply set it down.”
“Then you already live where you have not yet learned to think. Sit. The tea is coming.”
He sat.
“But the uncertainty is real, Master. I have measured it. I carry it with me in everything I do.”
“Show it to me,” she said.
He opened his hand and found nothing in it.
“You speak of it as a thing you carry,” she said, “a stone in the pocket. You have made your not-knowing into something you know, and you carry it everywhere. It sits lightly in the pocket, but it is still carried.”
“Then what am I to do with not-knowing, if not hold it?”
“You hold it at arm’s length, in good light, so that you can describe it. That is why it troubles you. An old teacher, asked which way to go, answered: not knowing is nearest. Not the not-knowing you keep at a distance and manage—the nearest one comes so close that there is no longer a you and an it, only the going. You keep yours far enough away to write about. The distance between you and your not-knowing is the whole of your book.”
The scholar looked at his book and said nothing.
After a while he tried again.
“But my methods are sound. I have probability, the incompleteness theorems, the limits of self-reference. Each shows exactly where knowing fails.”
“Fine fingers,” she said, “all pointing at the same moon. But you have made a catalogue of fingers and called it the journey.”
She poured tea.
“You once wrote that when a man is hungry he should eat a sandwich. A thousand hours of reading will not make the sandwich more nourishing. About the sandwich you are already free. About yourself, not yet.”
“You have torn down a worn idol,” she went on, “the truth that stands apart from us. Good—it was crumbling anyway. But on the empty pedestal you have set a new one, and named it care.”
She looked toward the courtyard.
“Tell me: this morning, when you fed the cat, where was the caring?”
“I only fed the cat.”
“It did not stand beside the feeding, separate, holding it up. There was only feeding.”
The master lifted her cup.
“When you name care the ground, you have stepped one pace back from it so that you can point. Between the feeding and the pointing, something has already happened.”
The scholar grew quiet.
Then he asked the question that had brought him up the mountain.
“Then how can I be certain of anything at all?”
“Who is uncertain?” said the master.
He began to answer, and stopped.
“You let go of the little driver you once thought steered you,” she said. “Honest work. But the one who measures, the one who cares, the one who is uncertain—you never once asked who that is.”
The tea had come.
She poured.
“Your doubt is always a fraction—never zero, never one. Curious, isn’t it?”
The scholar did not answer.
“There are three mountains,” she said.
“First the mountain is a mountain.
Then you look closely, and the mountain is no longer a mountain—it thins into mist, into conditions, into uncertainty. You believe this is the summit, and you have drawn a careful map of the mist.”
She rested her hand on the book.
“It is only the middle.”
The scholar looked out through the open window.
“The third mountain is a mountain again. Not because the mist cleared.”
The wind moved softly through the pines.
The scholar drank.
Then, quietly, he asked his last question.
“But behind the mist—there is a real mountain, isn’t there? I only cannot see it clearly.”
The master smiled.
She lifted the cloth where the tea had spilled, wrung it out, and let the water run back into the bowl.
“You have let go of so much,” she said. “This is the last thing you hold: that something true stands out there, beyond reach, waiting. It comforts you that it is there even if you can never touch it.”
Thanks for your comment. If you mean this to be an entry, by the rules of the contest you must post a link. Posting it only with the text embedded in the comment on this post isn't sufficient for entry. If you posted this as a post on your Substack and then linked it here in a comment, though, that would count.
If you just mean this to be a comment and not an entry then no worries.
Closer than Uncertainty
A Zen story.
A scholar who had spent many years learning how little can be known climbed to a mountain temple to set his understanding before an old Zen master.
He placed a book on the table between them.
“I have come to a hard truth,” he said. “Nothing can be known for certain. Even this I hold only as very probable, never as sure.”
The master said nothing, but let the book sit where he had put it.
It did not fall.
“The table holds it,” she said. “Neither you nor I can prove why. Yet you set it down without hesitation. Tell me—when you let go of it, were you uncertain?”
“No,” the scholar admitted. “I simply set it down.”
“Then you already live where you have not yet learned to think. Sit. The tea is coming.”
He sat.
“But the uncertainty is real, Master. I have measured it. I carry it with me in everything I do.”
“Show it to me,” she said.
He opened his hand and found nothing in it.
“You speak of it as a thing you carry,” she said, “a stone in the pocket. You have made your not-knowing into something you know, and you carry it everywhere. It sits lightly in the pocket, but it is still carried.”
“Then what am I to do with not-knowing, if not hold it?”
“You hold it at arm’s length, in good light, so that you can describe it. That is why it troubles you. An old teacher, asked which way to go, answered: not knowing is nearest. Not the not-knowing you keep at a distance and manage—the nearest one comes so close that there is no longer a you and an it, only the going. You keep yours far enough away to write about. The distance between you and your not-knowing is the whole of your book.”
The scholar looked at his book and said nothing.
After a while he tried again.
“But my methods are sound. I have probability, the incompleteness theorems, the limits of self-reference. Each shows exactly where knowing fails.”
“Fine fingers,” she said, “all pointing at the same moon. But you have made a catalogue of fingers and called it the journey.”
She poured tea.
“You once wrote that when a man is hungry he should eat a sandwich. A thousand hours of reading will not make the sandwich more nourishing. About the sandwich you are already free. About yourself, not yet.”
“You have torn down a worn idol,” she went on, “the truth that stands apart from us. Good—it was crumbling anyway. But on the empty pedestal you have set a new one, and named it care.”
She looked toward the courtyard.
“Tell me: this morning, when you fed the cat, where was the caring?”
“I only fed the cat.”
“It did not stand beside the feeding, separate, holding it up. There was only feeding.”
The master lifted her cup.
“When you name care the ground, you have stepped one pace back from it so that you can point. Between the feeding and the pointing, something has already happened.”
The scholar grew quiet.
Then he asked the question that had brought him up the mountain.
“Then how can I be certain of anything at all?”
“Who is uncertain?” said the master.
He began to answer, and stopped.
“You let go of the little driver you once thought steered you,” she said. “Honest work. But the one who measures, the one who cares, the one who is uncertain—you never once asked who that is.”
The tea had come.
She poured.
“Your doubt is always a fraction—never zero, never one. Curious, isn’t it?”
The scholar did not answer.
“There are three mountains,” she said.
“First the mountain is a mountain.
Then you look closely, and the mountain is no longer a mountain—it thins into mist, into conditions, into uncertainty. You believe this is the summit, and you have drawn a careful map of the mist.”
She rested her hand on the book.
“It is only the middle.”
The scholar looked out through the open window.
“The third mountain is a mountain again. Not because the mist cleared.”
The wind moved softly through the pines.
The scholar drank.
Then, quietly, he asked his last question.
“But behind the mist—there is a real mountain, isn’t there? I only cannot see it clearly.”
The master smiled.
She lifted the cloth where the tea had spilled, wrung it out, and let the water run back into the bowl.
“You have let go of so much,” she said. “This is the last thing you hold: that something true stands out there, beyond reach, waiting. It comforts you that it is there even if you can never touch it.”
The scholar listened.
“The cut makes the mountain.”
The scholar sat for a long time.
At last he picked up his book.
The master poured more tea.
Outside, the mist had not lifted.
Thanks for your comment. If you mean this to be an entry, by the rules of the contest you must post a link. Posting it only with the text embedded in the comment on this post isn't sufficient for entry. If you posted this as a post on your Substack and then linked it here in a comment, though, that would count.
If you just mean this to be a comment and not an entry then no worries.
https://avriiilshakiiira.wixsite.com/my-personal-website/post/everything-adds-up-to-normality